Hi. I am sorry to be a bother but again I want to get answer to my question as I ask it vs assumption or misunderstanding

If you read below on my follow up question. You will see the answer where it says "It also sounds like the blood on the staple was from yourself and not from the other person" Not sure why that was assumed as I xlearly asked IF there was blood from the other person on staple???So again my question is:

If someone passing me a booklet poked themselves with a staple right before giving me the booklet and got their blood on it and second later while passing me the booklet the same staple pricked me which caused a dot of blood, can I get HIV from the staple?ANY risk?

Here are original questions:

« Go Back
Staple 2
Friday, October 17th
HIV Testing
HIV Transmission
No Risk
Hello. I asked a question below and somewhat confused. It's says no risk under my subject heading yet in the answer it says unlikely yet maybe get also says I was hypothetical

So late me state facts:

1. I was pricked by staple and a small dot of blood occurred from the hole it made

So my question was if the person handed me a booklet and cut themself on the same staple that seconds later pricked me and caused a dot of blood in my finger am I at ANY risk

And if not like the answer said below why would I need to get tested???

Original Q&A below

Hi there

I was at my sons university seminar where volunteers were passing booklets to attendees

When I received mine I accidentally pricked my finger on the staple on booklet. My concern is what if seconds before me, the person handing out the booklet did the same and his blood went on to staple then into my finger within a couple of seconds? Any risk here? Why or why not?

Thank you


In order for HIV transmission to occur,V is a very fragile virus meaning that in a very short exposure to air (within seconds) the virus is destroyed and therefore unable to transmit to another person. In order for HIV transmission to occur through a wound on a person the wound must be deep, open, and actively bleeding. In your case it does not sound like your wound had these characteristics As you don't mention that there was visible blood, and even if there was small trace amounts of blood present, it is likely that within the time frame from a potential HIV positive person pricking themselves with the same staple to you pricking yourself the virus would be destroyed. Based on what you have described it is very unlikely that you are at risk of HIV transmission; the best way to know your status however, is to be tested.


Thank you for contacting for contacting AIDS Vancouver Helpline. I will try and answer your question as best I can.

First off HIV can only be transmitted by human to human contact. As the previous helpline volunteer stated: body fluids with high levels of HIV such as blood, semen/pre-cum, and anal/vaginal fluids must have direct access to your blood stream. Since none of these activities were happening you have no risk. HIV is also destroyed very quickly when exposed to air.

There is no risk to exposure to HIV through the staple since it was exposed to the air, and since there was no human to human contact. It also sounds like the blood on the staple was from yourself and not from the other person. So you don't need to worry about exposure to HIV. If you want to check AIDS Vancouver's website at it may help gain insight into how HIV is transmitted. There is also no need for you to get testing because there is no risk.


Vancouver AIDS Helpline Volunteer
Hi there,

Thanks again for asking.

The short answer is no.

Let's assume that the blood from the person WAS on the staple and they WERE HIV positive. EVEN then, neither the quantity of blood nor the size of the staple cut would NOT pose a risk. The only time HIV has EVER been transmitted was during a knife attack where people were stabbed ( So we are talking freshly bleeding wounds that would demand immediate medical attention. A jab from a staple is not the same thing. Like the other volunteers have explained, for transmission to occur, body fluids containing HIV would need direct access to your blood stream. This would not happen in this case. There is NO RISK. You do NOT need to be tested based on this event alone. The only reason the volunteer mentioned testing was just to know your HIV status. They were not suggesting that you needed to be tested.

I hope this answers all of your questions; however, if you have more, feel free to write back.

To your health,


AIDS Vancouver Volunteer


Charitable Registration #
10668 9896 RR0001

© 2019
Privacy Policy


1101 Seymour Street
Suite 235, 2nd Floor
Vancouver, BC V6B 0R1


Main Phone: 604-893-2201
Fax: 604-893-2205